![]() So, what does this mean? It means that UV rays don't just disappear. About 95 percent of UV rays that touch the ground are UVA, compared to 5 percent UVB, says the American Cancer Society. ![]() UVA rays are just as strong during the winter as they are in any season, so they can reach your skin through the overcast sky.ĭespite being weaker than UVB, UVA rays are more likely to penetrate the sky and reach the Earth's surface. The strength of UVA rays, however, doesn't waver throughout the year. Although they're strongest during the summer, they can still burn your skin in the winter, per the Skin Cancer Foundation. UVB rays are the main cause of sunburn because they have more energy. Both can cause sunburn and skin damage, but they differ in terms of strength. There are two main types of UV rays: UVA and UVB. When you have too much exposure to these rays, your skin reacts by forming a sunburn, explains John Hopkins Medicine. The sun's UV rays, the invisible part of sunlight, are responsible for sunburns. ![]() Here's how to help prevent sunburn and other winter skin issues. With that said, you may ask yourself: Can you get a sunburn in the winter? The answer is yes, it's possible. It's true that you may see less of the sun during cold, snowy days, but ultraviolet (UV) light still shines through. What doesn't hibernate, however, are the sun's rays. Plants grow at a slower rate, and many animals go into hibernation. A comparison of similarly injured patients treated at burn centers showed frostbite injury as a significant predictor of increased LOS and hospital costs compared to burn-injured patients.During the winter season, nature slows down. On multivariate analysis, all factors, except gender, remained independent predictors of increased hospital LOS. Factors associated with increased LOS included mechanism, age, gender, race, TBSA, ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation. Factors associated with increased hospital charges included mechanism, age, gender, race, TBSA, hospital LOS, ICU, and mechanical ventilation. 001) and hospital charges were significantly higher in frostbite patients ($43,400 vs $15,600, P <. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in frostbite patients (8.1 vs 4.0 days, P <. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) days and requirement for mechanical ventilation were not significantly different between the two groups, however frostbite patients were significantly more likely to require ICU care (26.5% vs 13.7%, P =. Mean total BSA (TBSA) did not differ between the two groups (frostbite: 2.1 and burn: 1.7, P =. Frostbite patients were less frequently covered by commercial insurance (25.3% vs 41.7%). Patients with frostbite injury were significantly older and more likely to be male. Patients were excluded if they had an inhalation injury recorded or unknown. The database was cleaned based on published protocols. Patients with frostbite injury and those with isolated hand and/or foot burns were identified in the National Burn Repository. Our aim was to examine differences in the hospital course of frostbite patients compared to those with burns limited to the hands and feet. ![]() Compared to the typical burn patient, frostbite injury frequently impacts those with high rates of mental illness, substance abuse, and those suffering homelessness. Numerous demographic, socioeconomic, and injury factors influence a burn patient's hospital course.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |